LAW MAKERS BECAME LAW PLAYERS...

"unofficial" and "unexpected" visit by a group of six Nepali parliamentary law makers to Dharamsala where both H. H. The Dalai Lama's residential house is exist and, is the base of Tibetan Government in Exile is situated, had made the headlines in the newspaper and other media channels in Nepal on the 5th July 2009, just before one day of H. H. The Dalai Lama's 75th birthday.This high-level meeting between the two parties come to light only on 5th July 2009 when the meeting take place on 21th June 2009. The disclosure of the confrontation after the fourteen days of original is considerable, specially when the revelation is made on before the last day of birthday of H. H. The Dalai Lama. This sudden act from the Nepal media and the Nepal government indicated a certain intension to drew attension from the world for a particular purpose, which is currently conceal under the statements of different relative sources.
China expressed deep concern over the issue, Deputy Chief at the Chinese embassy in Kathmandu showed her concern over the issue with the foreign minister of Nepal government who took a prompt step to educate the 'responsible' political parties with 'one china policy'. Even the former chinese ambassador made a 'surprise' visit to Nepal on Friday this month, he drew the government's attension and make 'inquirement' with Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal and Foreign Minister Sujata Koirala about the 'anti-chinese' activities in Nepal. Response to all this 'concerns' and 'visits', Prime Minister of Nepal declared the visit a "surprise", he also showoff his concern by summonning some law makers in the presense of Chinese Ambassador Qiu Gushong. Quoting the Prime Minister, a FDNF leader describe the meeting a 'nature' but 'as like accompanying a criminal'. Another political pary expressed the meeting as 'mysterious'. TMLP vice chairman clarified the situation by denying its law maker to have the right to represent the party at the meeting. MLF law maker Sardar who visit the Dalai Lama informed the media about his ignorance of particular visit to Dharamsala when he was summoned for a Delhi visit, but he claimted that H. H. The Dalai Lama of requesting him to assist in the Free Tibet Campaign and also in the development of Tibetan refugees and Tibetan organizations in the Nation. Another participant of the controversy meeting told the media that a exile Tibetan parliamentary delegation lead by the deputy speaker is about to visit Nepal within a week. He also boast of inviting both H. H. The Dalai Lama and Karmapa to Nepal. This dual different proclamation of same 'relate-source' worth for suspect and pressured the ordinary observers to arise various questions.
Why the long gap of fourteen days between the meeting and making news? Why adjustment of declaraion event with the H. H. The Dalai Lama's birthday? Why the Nepal Goverment's ignorantiated-announcement of the meeting even after the fourteen days of actual meeting? Why a law maker named B. P. Yadav claimted of recieving a Free Tibet movement request from H. H. The Dalai Lama when he already refrain from the movement itself in reality? why to declared of invitation to H. H. The Dalai Lama and Karmapa after all the denouncement speeches made from Nepal-related and Chinese-related sources.? These all 'shows' aim to something. They are definitely a target which they after even this comfuse the public. The realization of the activities of this politicians who are using the advandage of democracy in wrong way is anguishing and dissapointing.
Anyway according to different people, they might be different conception and different confusion from this meeting. Depended on my own comprehension, i distinguish the message of this controversy in two 'might-be' dimensions.

1. To propered the direction of the current political conflict in Nepal in a different way, as the Maoist party is accusing the present ruling party of plotting the 'relapsement' of Monarch with a so-called Baby-king.
2. All the law makers who met H. H. The Dalai Lama are from the party which emerged from Terai area where almost all the population is Indian originated. Hence this independent parties might had been fuel by the Indian Government to expose the presense ot its influnece in the Nepal government to its 'counterparts' in the world.

Whatever it is, Tibetans are the victims. Take the example of banning the birthday celebration of H. H. The Dalai Lama, police in the kathmandu city restricted the movement of Tibetans, specially the monks. Nevertheless,

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO MY GURU, KING,GUARDIAN,GUIDE,PARENTS,,,EVERYTHING.

HIS HOLINESS THE DALAI LAMA.

MAY YOU LIVE LONG LONG LIFE FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL BEINGS IN THE WORLD. MAY YOU BLESS US WITH OUR PRAY AND WISHES.

FREE TIBET.